
Radeon R9 380
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌15.1% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon R9 380
2015Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌15.1% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 380X better than Radeon R9 380?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 380 make more sense than Radeon R9 380X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 380 and Radeon R9 380X

Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 380 scores 6,000 and the Radeon R9 380X reaches 6,131 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 380 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 380X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 380) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X). Raw compute: 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X). Boost clocks: 970 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,000 | 6,131+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.476 TFLOPS | 3.973 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 970 MHz | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 512 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 182.4 GB/s (Radeon R9 380) vs 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) — a 72.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 380. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s+72% | 106 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon R9 380) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R9 380X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | — | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 380 draws 220W versus the Radeon R9 380X's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The Radeon R9 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 380) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-12% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 27.3+11% | 24.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 380 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380X launched at $229. The Radeon R9 380 costs 13.1% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.2 (Radeon R9 380) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 380X) — the Radeon R9 380 offers 12.7% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-13% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.2+13% | 26.8 |
| Codename | Antigua | Antigua |
| Release | June 18 2015 | November 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #396 | #394 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













