
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 960 better than Radeon R9 380?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 380 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon R9 380

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the Radeon R9 380 reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133+2% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1792+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 3.476 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+21% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 448 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 380 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 182.4 GB/s (Radeon R9 380) — a 62.9% advantage for the Radeon R9 380. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380) — the GeForce GTX 960 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 182.4 GB/s+63% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon R9 380).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | — |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 75% difference. The GeForce GTX 960 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-55% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3+125% | 27.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380 launched at $199. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 30.2 (Radeon R9 380) — the GeForce GTX 960 offers 2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8+2% | 30.2 |
| Codename | GM206 | Antigua |
| Release | January 22 2015 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #393 | #396 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













