
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $401 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 207.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌201.5% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 960
2015Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $401 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 207.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌201.5% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 960 better than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS make more sense than GeForce GTX 960?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133+2% | 6,012 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+256% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2100 MHz+78% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3+2% | 60.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600. The GeForce GTX 960 costs 66.8% less ($401 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the GeForce GTX 960 offers 208% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-67% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8+208% | 10.0 |
| Codename | GM206 | Navi 23 |
| Release | January 22 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #393 | #135 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














