
Radeon R9 380
Popular choices:

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A500 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1000% higher power demand at 220W vs 20W.
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 220W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon R9 380
2015RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 220W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A500 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1000% higher power demand at 220W vs 20W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A500 Embedded GPU better than Radeon R9 380?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 380 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 380 and RTX A500 Embedded GPU

Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 380 scores 6,000 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 380 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 380) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 970 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,000 | 6,197+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.476 TFLOPS | 5.468 TFLOPS+57% |
| Boost Clock | 970 MHz | 1335 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.44 MB | 2 MB+355% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 380 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380) vs 2 MB (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 380 draws 220W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 166.7% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 380) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 20W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 82mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 27.3 | 309.9+1035% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Codename | Antigua | GA107S |
| Release | June 18 2015 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #396 | #389 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













