
Radeon R9 380X
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅45.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $571 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 257% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
- ❌22000% longer card at 221mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 221mm, a 220mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌249.3% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon R9 380X
2015Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅45.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $571 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 257% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 221mm, a 220mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
- ❌22000% longer card at 221mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌249.3% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 380X better than Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 380X and Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 380X scores 6,131 and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 380X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Boost clocks: 970 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,131+2% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Boost Clock | 970 MHz+8% | 900 MHz |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) vs 307.2 GB/s (Dual) (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — a 189.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit (Dual).
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 106 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s (Dual)+190% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit (Dual)+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 380X) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 380X) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 380X draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 380X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 221mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 200W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 221mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.5 | 30.0+22% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 380X launched at $229 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire launched at $800. The Radeon R9 380X costs 71.4% less ($571 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.8 (Radeon R9 380X) vs 7.5 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — the Radeon R9 380X offers 257.3% better value. The Radeon R9 380X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-71% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.8+257% | 7.5 |
| Codename | Antigua | Neptune CF |
| Release | November 19 2015 | March 1 2014 |
| Ranking | #394 | #348 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













