
Radeon R9 380X
Popular choices:

Tesla M6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 330.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
- ❌22000% longer card at 221mm vs 1mm.
Tesla M6
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 221mm, a 220mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌336.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon R9 380X
2015Tesla M6
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 330.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 221mm, a 220mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
- ❌22000% longer card at 221mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌336.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla M6 better than Radeon R9 380X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 380X make more sense than Tesla M6?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 380X | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 380X | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 380X | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 380X | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 380X and Tesla M6

Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.

Tesla M6
Tesla M6
The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 380X scores 6,131 and the Tesla M6 reaches 6,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 380X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 970 MHz vs 1180 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,131 | 6,225+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.973 TFLOPS+10% | 3.625 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 970 MHz | 1180 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 576 KB+13% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380X) vs 2 MB (Tesla M6) — the Tesla M6 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 380X) vs 12 (Tesla M6). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 380X) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC 5th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 380X draws 250W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Tesla M6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 380X) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 221mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 221mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.5 | 62.3+154% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 380X launched at $229 MSRP, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000. The Radeon R9 380X costs 77.1% less ($771 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.8 (Radeon R9 380X) vs 6.2 (Tesla M6) — the Radeon R9 380X offers 332.3% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-77% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.8+332% | 6.2 |
| Codename | Antigua | GM204 |
| Release | November 19 2015 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #394 | #388 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













