Radeon R9 380X vs Tesla M6

AMD

Radeon R9 380X

2015Boost: 970 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M6

2015Core: 930 MHzBoost: 1180 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon R9 380X

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 330.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
  • 22000% longer card at 221mm vs 1mm.

Tesla M6

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 221mm, a 220mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 336.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Tesla M6 better than Radeon R9 380X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,131 vs 6,225 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Tesla M6 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (100W vs 250W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 380X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Tesla M6 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Tesla M6 is about 336.7% more expensive on MSRP at $1,000 MSRP versus $229 MSRP, and you are getting 1.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 380X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon R9 380X make more sense than Tesla M6?
Yes. Radeon R9 380X is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $229 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Tesla M6. The trade-off is that Tesla M6 currently gives you 1.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 380X still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon R9 380XTesla M6
1080p
low78 FPS104 FPS
medium67 FPS90 FPS
high54 FPS73 FPS
ultra35 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low68 FPS91 FPS
medium60 FPS80 FPS
high43 FPS58 FPS
ultra27 FPS33 FPS
4K
low25 FPS29 FPS
medium23 FPS27 FPS
high15 FPS18 FPS
ultra13 FPS16 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon R9 380XTesla M6
1080p
low133 FPS213 FPS
medium105 FPS175 FPS
high86 FPS130 FPS
ultra61 FPS101 FPS
1440p
low78 FPS159 FPS
medium58 FPS126 FPS
high44 FPS100 FPS
ultra31 FPS75 FPS
4K
low31 FPS86 FPS
medium23 FPS69 FPS
high18 FPS56 FPS
ultra13 FPS42 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon R9 380XTesla M6
1080p
low276 FPS280 FPS
medium221 FPS224 FPS
high184 FPS187 FPS
ultra138 FPS140 FPS
1440p
low207 FPS210 FPS
medium166 FPS168 FPS
high138 FPS140 FPS
ultra103 FPS105 FPS
4K
low138 FPS140 FPS
medium110 FPS112 FPS
high92 FPS93 FPS
ultra69 FPS70 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon R9 380XTesla M6
1080p
low135 FPS182 FPS
medium112 FPS148 FPS
high97 FPS132 FPS
ultra83 FPS103 FPS
1440p
low100 FPS131 FPS
medium83 FPS109 FPS
high72 FPS99 FPS
ultra58 FPS76 FPS
4K
low60 FPS77 FPS
medium47 FPS60 FPS
high37 FPS49 FPS
ultra26 FPS36 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 380X and Tesla M6

AMD

Radeon R9 380X

The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.

NVIDIA

Tesla M6

The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 380X scores 6,131 and the Tesla M6 reaches 6,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 380X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 970 MHz vs 1180 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 380XTesla M6
G3D Mark Score
6,131
6,225+2%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+33%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.973 TFLOPS+10%
3.625 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
970 MHz
1180 MHz+22%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
128+33%
96
L1 Cache
512 KB
576 KB+13%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 380XTesla M6
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380X) vs 2 MB (Tesla M6) — the Tesla M6 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 380XTesla M6
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 380X) vs 12 (Tesla M6). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon R9 380XTesla M6
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 380X) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

FeatureRadeon R9 380XTesla M6
Encoder
VCE 3.0
NVENC 5th Gen
Decoder
UVD 6.0
NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 380X draws 250W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Tesla M6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 380X) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 221mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon R9 380XTesla M6
TDP
250W
100W-60%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
221mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
24.5
62.3+154%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 380X launched at $229 MSRP, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000. The Radeon R9 380X costs 77.1% less ($771 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.8 (Radeon R9 380X) vs 6.2 (Tesla M6) — the Radeon R9 380X offers 332.3% better value.

FeatureRadeon R9 380XTesla M6
MSRP
$229-77%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
26.8+332%
6.2
Codename
Antigua
GM204
Release
November 19 2015
August 30 2015
Ranking
#394
#388