
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 250W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌31% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.7 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 250W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 250W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌31% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.7 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 250W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce MX570 A better than Radeon R9 380X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 380X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 69 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and Radeon R9 380X

GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Radeon R9 380X reaches 6,131 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 380X uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208+1% | 6,131 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+19% | 3.973 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz+19% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX570 A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 380X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) vs 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) — a 10.4% advantage for the Radeon R9 380X. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380X) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 106 GB/s+10% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 380X's 250W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380X). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-90% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+913% | 24.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380X launched at $229. The Radeon R9 380X costs 23.7% less ($71 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 380X) — the Radeon R9 380X offers 29.5% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $229-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7 | 26.8+29% |
| Codename | GA107 | Antigua |
| Release | Maio 2022 | November 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #387 | #394 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













