GeForce MX570 A vs Radeon Pro WX 7130

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce MX570 A

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 223% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 130W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

✅35.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
233.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌420% higher power demand at 130W vs 25W.

GeForce MX570 A

2022

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 223% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 130W, a 105W reduction.

Why buy it

✅35.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
233.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌420% higher power demand at 130W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro WX 7130 better than GeForce MX570 A?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 7130 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Pro WX 7130 averages 35.0% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 6,406 vs 6,208 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro WX 7130 is a 2016 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce MX570 A is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX570 A is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 8nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro WX 7130 is about 233.3% more expensive on MSRP at $1,000 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 35.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.2% higher G3D Mark. GeForce MX570 A really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce MX570 A make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 7130?

Yes. GeForce MX570 A is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (25W vs 130W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $300 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro WX 7130. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro WX 7130 currently gives you 3.2% higher G3D Mark and 35.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce MX570 A still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX570 A Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 7130 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	81 FPS	104 FPS
medium	69 FPS	88 FPS
high	56 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	71 FPS	90 FPS
medium	62 FPS	75 FPS
high	44 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	36 FPS
medium	24 FPS	32 FPS
high	16 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 A Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	160 FPS	182 FPS
medium	129 FPS	160 FPS
high	99 FPS	130 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	118 FPS	133 FPS
medium	91 FPS	111 FPS
high	71 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	74 FPS
medium	54 FPS	64 FPS
high	42 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 A Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	279 FPS	288 FPS
medium	223 FPS	231 FPS
high	186 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	140 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	210 FPS	216 FPS
medium	168 FPS	173 FPS
high	140 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	140 FPS	144 FPS
medium	112 FPS	115 FPS
high	93 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	72 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 A Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	137 FPS	248 FPS
medium	113 FPS	215 FPS
high	95 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	188 FPS
medium	86 FPS	165 FPS
high	73 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	104 FPS
medium	49 FPS	85 FPS
high	39 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	54 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 A Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and Radeon Pro WX 7130

GeForce MX570 A

The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1243 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon Pro WX 7130
G3D Mark Score	6,208	6,406+3%
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 4.0
Process Node	8 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048	2304+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS	5.728 TFLOPS+21%
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	1243 MHz+8%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	144+125%
L1 Cache	2 MB+257%	0.56 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX570 A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX570 A comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon Pro WX 7130
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 135.5% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	Radeon Pro WX 7130
TDP	25W-81%	130W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	248.3+404%	49.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. The GeForce MX570 A costs 70% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the GeForce MX570 A offers 223.4% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).