
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:

Quadro M4000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 100W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro M4000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 100W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Quadro M4000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 100W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 100W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce MX570 A better than Quadro M4000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M4000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 69 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and Quadro M4000M

GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Quadro M4000M reaches 6,148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Quadro M4000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1 (Quadro M4000M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,148 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+60% | 1,280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+90% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz+14% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+326% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX570 A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M4000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Quadro M4000M's 100W — a 120% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (Quadro M4000M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-75% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+304% | 61.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | GM204 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #387 | #392 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













