
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅7.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Quadro P3000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅7.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P3000 (móvel) better than GeForce MX570 A?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce MX570 A make more sense than Quadro P3000 (móvel)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 44 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and Quadro P3000 (móvel)

GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Quadro P3000 (móvel) reaches 6,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Quadro P3000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1,280 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 3.11 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,385+3% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+60% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+52% | 3.11 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1215 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 40 | 48+20% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+326% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX570 A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Quadro P3000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-67% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+192% | 85.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP, while the Quadro P3000 (móvel) launched at $600. The GeForce MX570 A costs 50% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 10.6 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) — the GeForce MX570 A offers 95.3% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-50% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7+95% | 10.6 |
| Codename | GA107 | GP104 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #387 | #380 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













