
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:

Tesla M6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 232.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 100W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla M6
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 100W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Tesla M6
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 232.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 100W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 100W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla M6 better than GeForce MX570 A?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce MX570 A make more sense than Tesla M6?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and Tesla M6

GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Tesla M6
Tesla M6
The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Tesla M6 reaches 6,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1180 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,225 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+31% | 3.625 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1180 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 64 | 96+50% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+257% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX570 A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M6 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 120% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-75% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+299% | 62.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000. The GeForce MX570 A costs 70% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 6.2 (Tesla M6) — the GeForce MX570 A offers 233.9% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-70% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7+234% | 6.2 |
| Codename | GA107 | GM204 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #387 | #388 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













