
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅0.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 220W, a 195W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌50.8% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.7 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌780% higher power demand at 220W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅0.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 220W, a 195W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌50.8% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.7 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌780% higher power demand at 220W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce MX570 A better than Radeon R9 380?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 380 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and Radeon R9 380

GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Radeon R9 380 reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208+3% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+36% | 3.476 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz+19% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+355% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX570 A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 380 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) vs 182.4 GB/s (Radeon R9 380) — a 90% advantage for the Radeon R9 380. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 182.4 GB/s+90% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 159.2% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+810% | 27.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380 launched at $199. The Radeon R9 380 costs 33.7% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 30.2 (Radeon R9 380) — the Radeon R9 380 offers 45.9% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $199-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7 | 30.2+46% |
| Codename | GA107 | Antigua |
| Release | Maio 2022 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #387 | #396 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













