
Radeon R9 290X
Popular choices:

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 290X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌337.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 80W.
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 350W, a 270W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Radeon R9 290X
2013RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 350W, a 270W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌337.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A4500 Embedded GPU better than Radeon R9 290X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 290X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 46 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 382 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 95 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 290X and RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 510 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,485 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 290X scores 8,426 and the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU reaches 8,485 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 290X is built on GCN 2.0 while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X) vs 14.31 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 947 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,426 | 8,485 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 5888+109% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.632 TFLOPS | 14.31 TFLOPS+154% |
| Boost Clock | 947 MHz | 1215 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 176 | 184+5% |
| L1 Cache | 0.69 MB | 5.8 MB+741% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 290X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 512-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X) vs 4 MB (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+300% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X) vs NVENC 8.0 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 290X draws 350W versus the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU's 80W — a 125.6% difference. The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 290X) vs 500W (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 275mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 80W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 500W-33% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 275mm | 0mm |
| Height | 109mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.1 | 106.1+340% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | — |
| Codename | Hawaii | GA104 |
| Release | October 24 2013 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #342 | #307 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












