Radeon R9 290X vs Radeon R9 290X / 390X

AMD

Radeon R9 290X

2013Boost: 947 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 290X / 390X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon R9 290X

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 27.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 275W.

Radeon R9 290X / 390X

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 275W instead of 350W, a 75W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 290X better than Radeon R9 290X / 390X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 8,426 vs 8,380 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R9 290X is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 290X is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon R9 290X can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $549 MSRP. Radeon R9 290X is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 290X is in basically the same MSRP band at $549 MSRP versus $549 MSRP, and you are getting 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 290X / 390X is the newer 2015 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (275W vs 350W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon R9 290X / 390X make more sense than Radeon R9 290X?
Yes. Radeon R9 290X / 390X is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (275W vs 350W), and staying closer to $549 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 290X. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 290X currently gives you 0.5% higher G3D Mark. It only holds a slight 0.5% edge in G3D-per-dollar, so the value lead is real but narrow.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290X / 390X
1080p
low103 FPS80 FPS
medium89 FPS69 FPS
high72 FPS56 FPS
ultra43 FPS37 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS70 FPS
medium79 FPS61 FPS
high57 FPS45 FPS
ultra33 FPS28 FPS
4K
low28 FPS25 FPS
medium27 FPS24 FPS
high18 FPS16 FPS
ultra15 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290X / 390X
1080p
low197 FPS185 FPS
medium168 FPS157 FPS
high134 FPS130 FPS
ultra104 FPS103 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS130 FPS
medium104 FPS102 FPS
high82 FPS82 FPS
ultra62 FPS63 FPS
4K
low61 FPS59 FPS
medium49 FPS48 FPS
high44 FPS43 FPS
ultra35 FPS35 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290X / 390X
1080p
low379 FPS377 FPS
medium303 FPS302 FPS
high253 FPS251 FPS
ultra190 FPS189 FPS
1440p
low284 FPS283 FPS
medium228 FPS226 FPS
high190 FPS189 FPS
ultra142 FPS141 FPS
4K
low190 FPS189 FPS
medium152 FPS151 FPS
high126 FPS126 FPS
ultra95 FPS94 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290X / 390X
1080p
low155 FPS155 FPS
medium128 FPS128 FPS
high110 FPS110 FPS
ultra94 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low110 FPS110 FPS
medium91 FPS91 FPS
high79 FPS79 FPS
ultra65 FPS65 FPS
4K
low66 FPS66 FPS
medium52 FPS52 FPS
high41 FPS41 FPS
ultra31 FPS31 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 290X and Radeon R9 290X / 390X

AMD

Radeon R9 290X

The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.

AMD

Radeon R9 290X / 390X

The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,380 points. Launch price was $429.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 290X scores 8,426 and the Radeon R9 290X / 390X reaches 8,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 290X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Raw compute: 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Boost clocks: 947 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290X / 390X
G3D Mark Score
8,426
8,380
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2816
2816
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.632 TFLOPS
5.914 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock
947 MHz
1050 MHz+11%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
176
176
L1 Cache
704 KB
704 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290X / 390X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 512-bit vs 512-bit.

FeatureRadeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290X / 390X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
320 GB/s
Bus Width
512-bit
512-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290X / 390X
DirectX
12.0
12.0
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6
6
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X).

FeatureRadeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290X / 390X
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 4.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 290X draws 350W versus the Radeon R9 290X / 390X's 275W — a 24% difference. The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 290X) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 95°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290X / 390X
TDP
350W
275W-21%
Recommended PSU
750W
750W
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
275mm
275mm
Height
109mm
109mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
95°C
95°C
Perf/Watt
24.1
30.5+27%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 290X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X launched at $549. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) — the Radeon R9 290X / 390X offers 0% better value. The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290X / 390X
MSRP
$549
$549
Performance per Dollar
15.3
15.3
Codename
Hawaii
Grenada
Release
October 24 2013
June 18 2015
Ranking
#342
#287