
Radeon R9 290X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 290X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌206.7% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌218.2% higher power demand at 350W vs 110W.
Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 221.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 350W, a 240W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 290X
2013Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 221.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 350W, a 240W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌206.7% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌218.2% higher power demand at 350W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500 better than Radeon R9 290X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 290X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 290X and Radeon RX 5500

Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.

Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 290X scores 8,426 and the Radeon RX 5500 reaches 8,837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 290X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500). Raw compute: 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500). Boost clocks: 947 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,426 | 8,837+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+100% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.632 TFLOPS+8% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 947 MHz | 1845 MHz+95% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 176+100% | 88 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 290X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290X) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500) — a 42.9% advantage for the Radeon R9 290X. Bus width: 512-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+43% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit+300% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 290X draws 350W versus the Radeon RX 5500's 110W — a 104.3% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 290X) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 110W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 450W-40% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 275mm | 180mm |
| Height | 109mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 75°C-21% |
| Perf/Watt | 24.1 | 80.3+233% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 290X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 5500 costs 67.4% less ($370 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X) vs 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 222.9% better value. The Radeon RX 5500 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $179-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 49.4+223% |
| Codename | Hawaii | Navi 14 |
| Release | October 24 2013 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #342 | #297 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












