G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 261.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 230W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
258.1% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
❌91.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 120W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 261.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 230W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
258.1% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
❌91.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 120W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than Radeon Pro WX 8200?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,747 vs 12,615 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (120W vs 230W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $279 MSRP. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is about $720 cheaper on MSRP at $279 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 1.0% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $279 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (120W vs 230W), and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Is Radeon Pro WX 8200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 8200 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $999 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 8200 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low	98 FPS	163 FPS
medium	88 FPS	140 FPS
high	76 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	75 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	130 FPS
medium	77 FPS	108 FPS
high	66 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	45 FPS	50 FPS
medium	41 FPS	43 FPS
high	30 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 8200

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low	269 FPS	320 FPS
medium	227 FPS	277 FPS
high	170 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	136 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	183 FPS	209 FPS
medium	156 FPS	175 FPS
high	124 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	106 FPS	100 FPS
medium	89 FPS	81 FPS
high	72 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 8200

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low	532 FPS	568 FPS
medium	443 FPS	454 FPS
high	347 FPS	378 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	284 FPS
1440p
low	430 FPS	426 FPS
medium	344 FPS	341 FPS
high	287 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	215 FPS	213 FPS
4K
low	287 FPS	284 FPS
medium	229 FPS	227 FPS
high	166 FPS	189 FPS
ultra	126 FPS	142 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 8200

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low	401 FPS	272 FPS
medium	326 FPS	237 FPS
high	263 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	330 FPS	207 FPS
medium	268 FPS	184 FPS
high	206 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	164 FPS	126 FPS
4K
low	158 FPS	123 FPS
medium	119 FPS	108 FPS
high	107 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	68 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 8200

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 8200

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon Pro WX 8200

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
G3D Mark Score	12,747+1%	12,615
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536	3584+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.437 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS+98%
Boost Clock	1770 MHz+18%	1500 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	96	224+133%
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+70%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB+167%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	VCE 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD 7.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 62.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
TDP	120W-48%	230W
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	106.2+94%	54.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti costs 72.1% less ($720 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers 262.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).