
GeForce RTX 5070
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 645% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 295W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅15.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌628.4% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌18% higher power demand at 295W vs 250W.
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 645% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 295W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅15.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌628.4% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌18% higher power demand at 295W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5070 better than Radeon PRO W7900?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7900 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 191 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 945 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 690 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 292 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 946 FPS |
| medium | 663 FPS | 801 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 714 FPS |
| ultra | 532 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 456 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 317 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 and Radeon PRO W7900

GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.

Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5070 scores 28,854 and the Radeon PRO W7900 reaches 28,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5070 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2512 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,854+2% | 28,211 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+99% |
| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz | 2495 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 192+140% |
| TMUs | 192 | 384+100% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 96+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 5070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 864 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 16.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 5070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 245mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-15% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 245mm | 267mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 115.4+21% | 95.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 launched at $549 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. The GeForce RTX 5070 costs 86.3% less ($3450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.6 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 5070 offers 640.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 5070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-86% | $3999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.6+641% | 7.1 |
| Codename | GB205 | Navi 31 |
| Release | March 4 2025 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #22 | #26 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












