
Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,070 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 722.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 400W, a 330W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 280mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅31.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌715.6% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 70W.
- ❌29.6% longer card at 280mm vs 216mm.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,070 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 722.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 400W, a 330W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 280mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅31.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌715.6% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 70W.
- ❌29.6% longer card at 280mm vs 216mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7500 better than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 399 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7500 and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,298 | 13,182 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3840 ×2+114% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.19 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+24% |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz | 1967 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 240 ×2+114% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 60 ×2+114% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 140.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 216mm vs 280mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-83% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 216mm | 280mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 190.0+476% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. The Radeon PRO W7500 costs 87.7% less ($3070 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 715.8% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-88% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.0+716% | 3.8 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Navi 21 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #192 | #157 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













