
GeForce RTX 5070
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,950 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 383.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 245mm instead of 267mm, a 22mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌355.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,950 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 383.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 245mm instead of 267mm, a 22mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅5.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌355.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5070 better than Radeon PRO W7800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 151 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 918 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 291 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 881 FPS |
| medium | 663 FPS | 732 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 532 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 445 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 and Radeon PRO W7800

GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.

Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5070 scores 28,854 versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 27,180 — the GeForce RTX 5070 leads by 6.2%. The GeForce RTX 5070 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 2512 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,854+6% | 27,180 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+37% | 4480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS | 45.25 TFLOPS+47% |
| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz | 2525 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 128+60% |
| TMUs | 192 | 280+46% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 70+46% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 5070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s+17% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 3.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 5070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 245mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-4% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 245mm | 267mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 115.4+10% | 104.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 launched at $549 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 5070 costs 78% less ($1950 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.6 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 5070 offers 382.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 5070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-78% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.6+383% | 10.9 |
| Codename | GB205 | Navi 31 |
| Release | March 4 2025 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #22 | #28 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












