
Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 56
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅2.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 210W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 280mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌7.5% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 210W vs 70W.
- ❌29.6% longer card at 280mm vs 216mm.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅2.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 210W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 280mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌7.5% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 210W vs 70W.
- ❌29.6% longer card at 280mm vs 216mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7500 better than Radeon RX Vega 56?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 399 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 440 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7500 and Radeon RX Vega 56

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7500 scores 13,298 and the Radeon RX Vega 56 reaches 13,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7500 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1471 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,298+2% | 13,026 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3584+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.19 TFLOPS+16% | 10.54 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz+16% | 1471 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 224+100% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 896 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 2048-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 2048-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7500 draws 70W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 100% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 216mm vs 280mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-67% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 216mm | 280mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 190.0+206% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399. The Radeon RX Vega 56 costs 7% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) vs 32.6 (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 5.2% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7500 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429 | $399-7% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.0 | 32.6+5% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #192 | #199 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













