
Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:

TITAN V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅24.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($2,249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
TITAN V
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌33.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$2,249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W6800
2021TITAN V
2017Why buy it
- ✅24.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($2,249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌33.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$2,249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6800 better than TITAN V?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is TITAN V still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 912 FPS | 875 FPS |
| medium | 730 FPS | 715 FPS |
| high | 608 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 456 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 456 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 687 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6800 and TITAN V

Radeon PRO W6800
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.

TITAN V
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6800 scores 20,270 and the TITAN V reaches 20,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the TITAN V uses Volta, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 5,120 (TITAN V). Raw compute: 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V). Boost clocks: 2320 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,270 | 20,077 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Volta |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 5120+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.82 TFLOPS+20% | 14.9 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2320 MHz+59% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 240 | 320+33% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 7.5 MB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4.5 MB+13% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6800 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN V has 12 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 653 GB/s (TITAN V) — a 13.4% advantage for the TITAN V. Bus width: 256-bit vs 3072-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 4.5 MB (TITAN V) — the TITAN V has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+167% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 653 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 3072-bit+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4.5 MB+13% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12.1 (TITAN V). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6800 draws 250W versus the TITAN V's 250W — a 0% difference. The TITAN V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 600W (TITAN V). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.1 | 80.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249 MSRP, while the TITAN V launched at $2999. The Radeon PRO W6800 costs 25% less ($750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 6.7 (TITAN V) — the Radeon PRO W6800 offers 34.3% better value. The Radeon PRO W6800 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2249-25% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0+34% | 6.7 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GV100 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | December 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #74 | #109 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












