
Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅65.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌12.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,249 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.3 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W6800
2021RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅65.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.3 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌12.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,249 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation better than Radeon PRO W6800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W6800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 912 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 730 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 608 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 456 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 456 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 687 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 37 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6800 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Radeon PRO W6800
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6800 scores 20,270 and the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation reaches 20,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2320 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,270 | 20,669+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 6144+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.82 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 2320 MHz+49% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+25% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 6 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+25% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6800 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 105.7% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+1500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+106% | 280 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6800 draws 250W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.1 | 295.3+264% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation costs 11.1% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation offers 14.4% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2249 | $1999-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 10.3+14% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | AD104 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #74 | #71 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












