
Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:

RTX A5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,351 less on MSRP ($2,249 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅5.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌60.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$2,249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W6800
2021RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,351 less on MSRP ($2,249 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅5.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌60.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$2,249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A5500 better than Radeon PRO W6800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W6800 make more sense than RTX A5500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 912 FPS | 894 FPS |
| medium | 730 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 608 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 456 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 456 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 237 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 687 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6800 and RTX A5500

Radeon PRO W6800
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.

RTX A5500
RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6800 scores 20,270 and the RTX A5500 reaches 21,108 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 2320 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 80 (RTX A5500) vs 320.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,270 | 21,108+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 10240+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.82 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+91% |
| Boost Clock | 2320 MHz+39% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 240 | 320+33% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 10 MB+1233% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 80+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A5500 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6800 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 has 24 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the RTX A5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 768 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6800 draws 250W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 8.3% difference. The RTX A5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 230W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.1 | 91.8+13% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249 MSRP, while the RTX A5500 launched at $3600. The Radeon PRO W6800 costs 37.5% less ($1351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 5.9 (RTX A5500) — the Radeon PRO W6800 offers 52.5% better value. The RTX A5500 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2249-38% | $3600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0+53% | 5.9 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GA102 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #74 | #67 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












