
Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($2,249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅6.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌11.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$2,249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W6800
2021TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($2,249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅6.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌11.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$2,249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6800 better than TITAN RTX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is TITAN RTX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 912 FPS | 904 FPS |
| medium | 730 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 608 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 456 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 456 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 687 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6800 and TITAN RTX

Radeon PRO W6800
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.

TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6800 scores 20,270 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 2320 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) vs 576.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,270 | 20,095 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 4608+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.82 TFLOPS+9% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2320 MHz+31% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 240 | 288+20% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4.5 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 72+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The TITAN RTX gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6800 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 16.7% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 672 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6800 draws 250W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 11.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-11% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 81.1+13% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249 MSRP, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. The Radeon PRO W6800 costs 10% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the Radeon PRO W6800 offers 12.5% better value. The Radeon PRO W6800 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2249-10% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0+13% | 8.0 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | TU102 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #74 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












