
Radeon Pro Vega 64
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌16.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌16.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6600X better than Radeon Pro Vega 64?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon PRO W6600X

Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 12,891 and the Radeon PRO W6600X reaches 13,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 2479 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,891 | 13,113+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+100% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.06 TFLOPS+9% | 10.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 2479 MHz+84% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+100% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600X has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W6600X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 70.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 120W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 51.6 | 109.3+112% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 costs 14.3% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers 14.4% better value. The Radeon PRO W6600X is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-14% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5+14% | 18.8 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 23 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #202 | #197 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












