G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 158W, a 38W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅21.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅366.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
❌31.7% higher power demand at 158W vs 120W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 158W, a 38W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅21.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅366.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
❌31.7% higher power demand at 158W vs 120W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

Yes. Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 21.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 3% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 28 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2018 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $279 MSRP, and you are getting 21.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

When does GeForce GTX 1660 Ti make more sense than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (120W vs 158W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $279 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU currently gives you 3.0% higher G3D Mark and 21.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
1080p
low	98 FPS	166 FPS
medium	88 FPS	148 FPS
high	76 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	146 FPS
medium	77 FPS	124 FPS
high	66 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	45 FPS	69 FPS
medium	41 FPS	60 FPS
high	30 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
1080p
low	269 FPS	301 FPS
medium	227 FPS	255 FPS
high	170 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	136 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	183 FPS	203 FPS
medium	156 FPS	172 FPS
high	124 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	106 FPS	99 FPS
medium	89 FPS	82 FPS
high	72 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
1080p
low	532 FPS	591 FPS
medium	443 FPS	473 FPS
high	347 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	295 FPS
1440p
low	430 FPS	443 FPS
medium	344 FPS	355 FPS
high	287 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	215 FPS	222 FPS
4K
low	287 FPS	295 FPS
medium	229 FPS	236 FPS
high	166 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	126 FPS	148 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
1080p
low	401 FPS	259 FPS
medium	326 FPS	224 FPS
high	263 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	153 FPS
1440p
low	330 FPS	197 FPS
medium	268 FPS	175 FPS
high	206 FPS	149 FPS
ultra	164 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	158 FPS	121 FPS
medium	119 FPS	105 FPS
high	107 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	67 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 and the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU reaches 13,130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	12,747	13,130+3%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536	3584 ×2+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.437 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS ×2+98%
Boost Clock	1770 MHz+18%	1500 MHz
ROPs	48	64 ×2+33%
TMUs	96	224 ×2+133%
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+70%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has 28 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 366.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) — the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	28 GB+367%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB+167%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU's 158W — a 27.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
TDP	120W-24%	158W
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	106.2+28%	83.1