Radeon Pro Duo vs Radeon R9 290 / 390

AMD

Radeon Pro Duo

2016Boost: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 290 / 390

2015Boost: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro Duo

2016

Why buy it

  • 30.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Measures 240mm instead of 275mm, a 35mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 355.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,499 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 24.8 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • 16.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 300W.

Radeon R9 290 / 390

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 347.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • Draws 300W instead of 350W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Duo across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 14.6% longer card at 275mm vs 240mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro Duo better than Radeon R9 290 / 390?
Yes. Radeon Pro Duo is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 30.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 1.8% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2015, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro Duo is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015 and more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Pro Duo is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro Duo is about 355.6% more expensive on MSRP at $1,499 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and you are getting 30.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.8% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 290 / 390 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon R9 290 / 390 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 290 / 390 is 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 8,150 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro DuoRadeon R9 290 / 390
1080p
low120 FPS80 FPS
medium103 FPS69 FPS
high85 FPS56 FPS
ultra59 FPS37 FPS
1440p
low97 FPS70 FPS
medium81 FPS61 FPS
high61 FPS45 FPS
ultra43 FPS28 FPS
4K
low43 FPS25 FPS
medium37 FPS24 FPS
high26 FPS16 FPS
ultra22 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro DuoRadeon R9 290 / 390
1080p
low243 FPS182 FPS
medium207 FPS154 FPS
high165 FPS128 FPS
ultra133 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low175 FPS130 FPS
medium147 FPS102 FPS
high123 FPS82 FPS
ultra96 FPS62 FPS
4K
low98 FPS59 FPS
medium83 FPS48 FPS
high69 FPS43 FPS
ultra52 FPS35 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro DuoRadeon R9 290 / 390
1080p
low373 FPS367 FPS
medium299 FPS293 FPS
high249 FPS244 FPS
ultra187 FPS183 FPS
1440p
low280 FPS275 FPS
medium224 FPS220 FPS
high187 FPS183 FPS
ultra140 FPS138 FPS
4K
low187 FPS183 FPS
medium149 FPS147 FPS
high124 FPS122 FPS
ultra93 FPS92 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro DuoRadeon R9 290 / 390
1080p
low237 FPS151 FPS
medium206 FPS124 FPS
high171 FPS107 FPS
ultra142 FPS91 FPS
1440p
low180 FPS109 FPS
medium160 FPS90 FPS
high128 FPS78 FPS
ultra105 FPS64 FPS
4K
low104 FPS64 FPS
medium87 FPS50 FPS
high70 FPS39 FPS
ultra55 FPS29 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Duo and Radeon R9 290 / 390

AMD

Radeon Pro Duo

The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.

AMD

Radeon R9 290 / 390

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,150 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Duo scores 8,299 and the Radeon R9 290 / 390 reaches 8,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Duo is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro DuoRadeon R9 290 / 390
G3D Mark Score
8,299+2%
8,150
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4096 ×2+60%
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.192 TFLOPS ×2+60%
5.12 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1000 MHz
ROPs
64 ×2
64
TMUs
256 ×2+60%
160
L1 Cache
1 MB+59%
0.63 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro DuoRadeon R9 290 / 390
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Duo comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro Duo offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Radeon Pro Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro DuoRadeon R9 290 / 390
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
512-bit+300%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon Pro DuoRadeon R9 290 / 390
DirectX
12.0
12.0
Vulkan
1.1
1.2+9%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290 / 390).

FeatureRadeon Pro DuoRadeon R9 290 / 390
Encoder
VCE 3.4
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 6.3
UVD 4.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Duo draws 350W versus the Radeon R9 290 / 390's 300W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 95°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro DuoRadeon R9 290 / 390
TDP
350W
300W-14%
Recommended PSU
500W-33%
750W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
240mm
275mm
Height
111mm
109mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-21%
95°C
Perf/Watt
23.7
27.2+15%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 launched at $329. The Radeon R9 290 / 390 costs 78.1% less ($1170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 24.8 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Radeon R9 290 / 390 offers 350.9% better value. The Radeon Pro Duo is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Pro DuoRadeon R9 290 / 390
MSRP
$1499
$329-78%
Performance per Dollar
5.5
24.8+351%
Codename
Capsaicin
Grenada
Release
April 26 2016
June 18 2015
Ranking
#309
#296