
Radeon Instinct MI60
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅31.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌650.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 640% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Instinct MI60 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅31.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 640% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 300W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌650.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Instinct MI60 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Instinct MI60 better than Radeon Pro 5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5700 make more sense than Radeon Instinct MI60?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 83 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Instinct MI60 and Radeon Pro 5700

Radeon Instinct MI60
Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.

Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Instinct MI60 scores 11,638 and the Radeon Pro 5700 reaches 11,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Instinct MI60 is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,638+1% | 11,469 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+78% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.75 TFLOPS+137% | 6.221 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1800 MHz+33% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+78% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 6+500% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Instinct MI60 draws 300W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 79.1% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 130W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 38.8 | 88.2+127% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Instinct MI60 launched at $6000 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799. The Radeon Pro 5700 costs 86.7% less ($5201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 offers 657.9% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6000 | $799-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 14.4+658% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | Navi 10 |
| Release | November 18 2018 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #232 | #238 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













