
Radeon Instinct MI60
Popular choices:

Tesla P40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla P40: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla P40 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌5.3% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$5,699 MSRP
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($5,699 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla P40: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla P40 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($5,699 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌5.3% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$5,699 MSRP
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla P40 better than Radeon Instinct MI60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Instinct MI60 make more sense than Tesla P40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 67 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 133 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Instinct MI60 and Tesla P40

Radeon Instinct MI60
Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.

Tesla P40
Tesla P40
The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Instinct MI60 scores 11,638 and the Tesla P40 reaches 11,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Instinct MI60 is built on GCN 5.1 while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,638 | 11,808+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+7% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.75 TFLOPS+25% | 11.76 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1800 MHz+18% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256+7% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1.4 MB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Instinct MI60 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P40 has 24 GB. The Tesla P40 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 3 MB (Tesla P40) — the Radeon Instinct MI60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Instinct MI60 draws 300W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The Tesla P40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 38.8 | 47.2+22% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Instinct MI60 launched at $6000 MSRP, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699. The Tesla P40 costs 5% less ($301 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 2.1 (Tesla P40) — the Tesla P40 offers 10.5% better value. The Radeon Instinct MI60 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6000 | $5699-5% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 2.1+11% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | GP102 |
| Release | November 18 2018 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #232 | #227 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













