
Radeon Instinct MI60
Popular choices:

RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌500% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 140W.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅14.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $5,000 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 509.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 300W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅14.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $5,000 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 509.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 300W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌500% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 140W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A4000H better than Radeon Instinct MI60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Instinct MI60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 73 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Instinct MI60 and RTX A4000H

Radeon Instinct MI60
Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.

RTX A4000H
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Instinct MI60 scores 11,638 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Instinct MI60 is built on GCN 5.1 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,638 | 11,815+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.75 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 1800 MHz+15% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256+33% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000H gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Instinct MI60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Instinct MI60 draws 300W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 140W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 38.8 | 84.4+118% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Instinct MI60 launched at $6000 MSRP, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. The RTX A4000H costs 83.3% less ($5000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Radeon Instinct MI60) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H offers 521.1% better value. The RTX A4000H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Instinct MI60 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6000 | $1000-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 11.8+521% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | GA104 |
| Release | November 18 2018 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #232 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













