
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 120W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌380% higher power demand at 120W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 120W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌380% higher power demand at 120W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 570 better than GeForce MX570 A?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce MX570 A make more sense than Radeon Pro 570?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and Radeon Pro 570

GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,337+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+19% | 3.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz+5% | 1105 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+355% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX570 A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 131% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-79% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+370% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 1.9% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7 | 21.1+2% |
| Codename | GA107 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #387 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













