Radeon 860M vs RTXA5000-24Q

AMD

Radeon 860M

2025Core: 600 MHzBoost: 3000 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTXA5000-24Q

2021Core: 1170 MHzBoost: 1695 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon 860M

2025

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 230W, a 215W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).

RTXA5000-24Q

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 860M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 1433.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon 860M better than RTXA5000-24Q?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,838 vs 4,803 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon 860M is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (15W vs 230W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 860M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2021, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
RTXA5000-24Q can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $3,721 MSRP. Radeon 860M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon 860M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $3,721 MSRP, and you are getting 0.7% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (15W vs 230W), and FSR upscaling.
Is RTXA5000-24Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. RTXA5000-24Q is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $3,721 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon 860M is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR upscaling.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon 860MRTXA5000-24Q
1080p
low37 FPS136 FPS
medium23 FPS116 FPS
high17 FPS98 FPS
ultra9 FPS61 FPS
1440p
low28 FPS107 FPS
medium16 FPS89 FPS
high9 FPS68 FPS
ultra5 FPS41 FPS
4K
low11 FPS39 FPS
medium7 FPS35 FPS
high4 FPS26 FPS
ultra3 FPS23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon 860MRTXA5000-24Q
1080p
low95 FPS216 FPS
medium61 FPS173 FPS
high40 FPS144 FPS
ultra29 FPS108 FPS
1440p
low62 FPS161 FPS
medium32 FPS125 FPS
high23 FPS104 FPS
ultra18 FPS81 FPS
4K
low25 FPS77 FPS
medium14 FPS63 FPS
high12 FPS58 FPS
ultra9 FPS51 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon 860MRTXA5000-24Q
1080p
low218 FPS216 FPS
medium174 FPS173 FPS
high145 FPS144 FPS
ultra109 FPS108 FPS
1440p
low163 FPS162 FPS
medium131 FPS130 FPS
high109 FPS108 FPS
ultra82 FPS81 FPS
4K
low109 FPS108 FPS
medium87 FPS86 FPS
high72 FPS72 FPS
ultra49 FPS54 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon 860MRTXA5000-24Q
1080p
low149 FPS214 FPS
medium116 FPS173 FPS
high98 FPS144 FPS
ultra78 FPS108 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS151 FPS
medium82 FPS128 FPS
high69 FPS108 FPS
ultra53 FPS81 FPS
4K
low62 FPS87 FPS
medium49 FPS72 FPS
high39 FPS58 FPS
ultra27 FPS44 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 860M and RTXA5000-24Q

AMD

Radeon 860M

The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.

NVIDIA

RTXA5000-24Q

The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 860M scores 4,838 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 860M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 860M) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q). Boost clocks: 3000 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Radeon 860M) vs 64 (RTXA5000-24Q) vs 256.

FeatureRadeon 860MRTXA5000-24Q
G3D Mark Score
4,838
4,803
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Ampere
Process Node
4 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
512
8192+1500%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.072 TFLOPS
27.77 TFLOPS+804%
Boost Clock
3000 MHz+77%
1695 MHz
ROPs
8
96+1100%
TMUs
32
256+700%
L1 Cache
0.06 MB
8 MB+13233%
L2 Cache
1 MB
6 MB+500%
Ray Tracing Cores
8
64+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTXA5000-24Q gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 860M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureRadeon 860MRTXA5000-24Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon 860M) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 860MRTXA5000-24Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
6 MB+500%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 860M draws 15W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 175.5% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 860M) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon 860MRTXA5000-24Q
TDP
15W-93%
230W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
322.5+1443%
20.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).

FeatureRadeon 860MRTXA5000-24Q
MSRP
$3721
Codename
Krackan Point
GA102
Release
Marchar 2025
April 12 2021
Ranking
#449
#53