
Radeon 860M
Popular choices:

RTXA5000-24Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 230W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
RTXA5000-24Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 860M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1433.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 15W.
Radeon 860M
2025RTXA5000-24Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 230W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 860M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1433.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 860M better than RTXA5000-24Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTXA5000-24Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 860M | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 860M | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 860M | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 860M | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 44 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 860M and RTXA5000-24Q

Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.

RTXA5000-24Q
RTXA5000-24Q
The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 860M scores 4,838 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 860M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 860M) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q). Boost clocks: 3000 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Radeon 860M) vs 64 (RTXA5000-24Q) vs 256.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,838 | 4,803 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 8192+1500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+804% |
| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz+77% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 96+1100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 256+700% |
| L1 Cache | 0.06 MB | 8 MB+13233% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 64+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTXA5000-24Q gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 860M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon 860M) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 860M draws 15W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 175.5% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 860M) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 322.5+1443% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon 860M | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3721 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | GA102 |
| Release | Marchar 2025 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #449 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












