
Radeon 860M
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M395
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M395
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Radeon 860M
2025Radeon R9 M395
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M395 better than Radeon 860M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 860M make more sense than Radeon R9 M395?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 860M and Radeon R9 M395

Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.

Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M395
The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 860M scores 4,838 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 860M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 860M) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,838 | 4,934+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1792+250% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 860M draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 860M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 322.5+390% | 65.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | — |
| Release | Marchar 2025 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #449 | #445 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












