GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Quadro GP100

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

2015Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1075 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro GP100

2016Core: 1304 MHzBoost: 1442 MHz

Popular choices:

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $6,351 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 978.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quadro GP100

2016

Why buy it

  • 39.1% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 978.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $7,000 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro GP100 better than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Yes. Quadro GP100 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 39.1% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data, 0% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 16 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2015, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 980 Ti is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro GP100 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro GP100 is about 978.6% more expensive on MSRP at $7,000 MSRP versus $649 MSRP, and you are getting 39.1% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (13,710 vs 13,711). GeForce GTX 980 Ti really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does GeForce GTX 980 Ti make more sense than Quadro GP100?
Yes. GeForce GTX 980 Ti is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $649 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro GP100. The trade-off is that Quadro GP100 currently gives you a lower G3D Mark (13,710 vs 13,711) and 39.1% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce GTX 980 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 980 TiQuadro GP100
1080p
low80 FPS190 FPS
medium69 FPS177 FPS
high56 FPS152 FPS
ultra37 FPS138 FPS
1440p
low70 FPS177 FPS
medium62 FPS149 FPS
high45 FPS118 FPS
ultra28 FPS108 FPS
4K
low26 FPS109 FPS
medium24 FPS91 FPS
high16 FPS67 FPS
ultra14 FPS61 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 980 TiQuadro GP100
1080p
low186 FPS313 FPS
medium164 FPS274 FPS
high133 FPS207 FPS
ultra104 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low128 FPS212 FPS
medium104 FPS181 FPS
high82 FPS145 FPS
ultra62 FPS118 FPS
4K
low60 FPS108 FPS
medium50 FPS91 FPS
high46 FPS75 FPS
ultra37 FPS59 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 980 TiQuadro GP100
1080p
low617 FPS617 FPS
medium494 FPS494 FPS
high411 FPS411 FPS
ultra308 FPS308 FPS
1440p
low463 FPS463 FPS
medium370 FPS370 FPS
high308 FPS308 FPS
ultra231 FPS231 FPS
4K
low308 FPS308 FPS
medium247 FPS247 FPS
high206 FPS206 FPS
ultra154 FPS154 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 980 TiQuadro GP100
1080p
low232 FPS455 FPS
medium197 FPS417 FPS
high161 FPS334 FPS
ultra136 FPS286 FPS
1440p
low177 FPS365 FPS
medium156 FPS337 FPS
high123 FPS259 FPS
ultra102 FPS218 FPS
4K
low102 FPS234 FPS
medium83 FPS218 FPS
high67 FPS177 FPS
ultra53 FPS146 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Quadro GP100

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.

NVIDIA

Quadro GP100

The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 and the Quadro GP100 reaches 13,710 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1442 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiQuadro GP100
G3D Mark Score
13,711
13,710
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2816
3584+27%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.06 TFLOPS
10.34 TFLOPS+71%
Boost Clock
1075 MHz
1442 MHz+34%
ROPs
96
96
TMUs
176
224+27%
L1 Cache
1 MB
1.3 MB+30%
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro GP100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiQuadro GP100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 has 16 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 204.8% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 384-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 4 MB (Quadro GP100) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiQuadro GP100
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
16 GB+167%
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM2
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
1024 GB/s+205%
Bus Width
384-bit
4096-bit+967%
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiQuadro GP100
DirectX
12.1
12
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiQuadro GP100
Encoder
NVENC 3.0
NVENC 4th gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
NVDEC 3rd gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 6.2% difference. The Quadro GP100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiQuadro GP100
TDP
250W
235W-6%
Recommended PSU
600W
500W-17%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
54.8
58.3+6%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti costs 90.7% less ($6351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 2.0 (Quadro GP100) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti offers 955% better value. The Quadro GP100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiQuadro GP100
MSRP
$649-91%
$7000
Performance per Dollar
21.1+955%
2.0
Codename
GM200
GP100
Release
June 2 2015
October 1 2016
Ranking
#179
#178