Quadro 4000M vs Radeon HD 6770

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro 4000M

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6770

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quadro 4000M

2011

Radeon HD 6770

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro 4000M better than Radeon HD 6770?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,287 vs 1,271 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro 4000M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 4000M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 2 GB instead of 1 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro 4000M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro 4000M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $129 MSRP, and you are getting 1.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 6770 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon HD 6770 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon HD 6770 is 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM, 1,271 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 4000M Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 6770 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 6770
1080p
low	51 FPS	15 FPS
medium	41 FPS	9 FPS
high	25 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	3 FPS
1440p
low	28 FPS	10 FPS
medium	21 FPS	5 FPS
high	12 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	7 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	11 FPS	4 FPS
medium	9 FPS	2 FPS
high	5 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	1 FPS

Open Quadro 4000M Open Radeon HD 6770

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 6770
1080p
low	58 FPS	34 FPS
medium	46 FPS	15 FPS
high	39 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	8 FPS
1440p
low	43 FPS	15 FPS
medium	30 FPS	7 FPS
high	20 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	18 FPS	5 FPS
medium	12 FPS	3 FPS
high	9 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	2 FPS

Open Quadro 4000M Open Radeon HD 6770

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 6770
1080p
low	58 FPS	57 FPS
medium	46 FPS	46 FPS
high	39 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	29 FPS
1440p
low	43 FPS	43 FPS
medium	35 FPS	34 FPS
high	29 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	29 FPS
medium	23 FPS	23 FPS
high	19 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	14 FPS

Open Quadro 4000M Open Radeon HD 6770

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 6770
1080p
low	58 FPS	57 FPS
medium	46 FPS	46 FPS
high	39 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	29 FPS
1440p
low	15 FPS	38 FPS
medium	13 FPS	28 FPS
high	11 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	9 FPS	15 FPS
4K
low	11 FPS	22 FPS
medium	8 FPS	16 FPS
high	7 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	8 FPS

Open Quadro 4000M Open Radeon HD 6770

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000M and Radeon HD 6770

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon HD 6770

The Radeon HD 6770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,271 points. Launch price was $129.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 4000M scores 1,287 and the Radeon HD 6770 reaches 1,271 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 6770 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 336 (Quadro 4000M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6770). Raw compute: 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6770).

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 6770
G3D Mark Score	1,287+1%	1,271
Architecture	Fermi	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	336	800+138%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6384 TFLOPS	1.36 TFLOPS+113%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	448 KB+460%	80 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 6770
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 4000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6770 has 1 GB. The Quadro 4000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 4000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6770) — the Quadro 4000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 6770
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6770's 108W — a 7.7% difference. The Quadro 4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.