
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Popular choices:

Xeon X5650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X5650.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5650, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Xeon X5650 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Xeon X5650
2010Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,742 vs 5,745).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Xeon X5650
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X5650.
Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5650, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Xeon X5650 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,742 vs 5,745).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X6 1100T BE better than Xeon X5650?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon X5650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon X5650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 74 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon X5650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 144 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon X5650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Xeon X5650

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X5650
Xeon X5650
The Xeon X5650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.06 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,742 points. Launch price was $53.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Xeon X5650's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE versus 3.06 GHz on the Xeon X5650 — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon X5650 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1100T BE scores 5,745 against the Xeon X5650's 5,742 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5650.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon X5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+21% | 3.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+24% | 2.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 5,745 | 5,742 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 508 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5650 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 memory speed. Memory channels: 2 (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) vs 3 (Xeon X5650). Chipset compatibility: AMD 870,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5650).
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon X5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Only the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5650). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy, Xeon X5650 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5650 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon X5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Legacy | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













