
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2430
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2430.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 5,755).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2430, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2430 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Xeon E5-2430
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Xeon E5-2430
2012Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2430.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 5,755).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2430, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2430 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2430 better than Phenom II X6 1100T BE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E5-2430 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E5-2430 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 47 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E5-2430 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 144 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E5-2430 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Xeon E5-2430

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2430
Xeon E5-2430
The Xeon E5-2430 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,755 points. Launch price was $119.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2430's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE versus 2.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2430 — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E5-2430 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1100T BE scores 5,745 against the Xeon E5-2430's 5,755 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2430. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2430.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E5-2430 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+37% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+50% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 15360 kB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) |
| PassMark | 5,745 | 5,755 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 508 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2430 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E5-2430 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) / not specified (Xeon E5-2430). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E5-2430 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Legacy | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













