Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Popular choices:
Xeon E3-1225 v6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E3-1225 v6.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1225 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌71.2% higher power demand at 125W vs 73W.
Xeon E3-1225 v6
2017Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 73W instead of 125W, a 52W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,740 vs 5,745).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Xeon E3-1225 v6
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E3-1225 v6.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 73W instead of 125W, a 52W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1225 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌71.2% higher power demand at 125W vs 73W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,740 vs 5,745).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X6 1100T BE better than Xeon E3-1225 v6?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1225 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1225 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 75 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1225 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1225 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Xeon E3-1225 v6
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon E3-1225 v6
Xeon E3-1225 v6
The Xeon E3-1225 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,740 points. Launch price was $213.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E3-1225 v6 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 v6 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E3-1225 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1100T BE scores 5,745 against the Xeon E3-1225 v6's 5,740 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1225 v6.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1225 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 5,745 | 5,740 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 508 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1225 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1225 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) / not specified (Xeon E3-1225 v6). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1225 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Legacy | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Xeon E3-1225 v6
