
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Popular choices:

Xeon Bronze 3106
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($265 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.7 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Bronze 3106.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 5,753).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3106, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌47.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 85W.
Xeon Bronze 3106
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 125W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Xeon Bronze 3106
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($265 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.7 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Bronze 3106.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 125W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 5,753).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3106, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌47.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Bronze 3106 better than Phenom II X6 1100T BE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon Bronze 3106 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon Bronze 3106 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon Bronze 3106 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 144 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon Bronze 3106 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Xeon Bronze 3106

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Bronze 3106
Xeon Bronze 3106
The Xeon Bronze 3106 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,753 points. Launch price was $306.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3106 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3106 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3106 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3106 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1100T BE scores 5,745 against the Xeon Bronze 3106's 5,753 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Bronze 3106. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs 11 MB (total) on the Xeon Bronze 3106.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon Bronze 3106 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 8 / 8+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+94% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 11 MB (total)+83% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 5,745 | 5,753 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 508 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3106 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE versus 2133 on the Xeon Bronze 3106 — the Xeon Bronze 3106 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Bronze 3106 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 32 GB — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) vs 6 (Xeon Bronze 3106). PCIe lanes: 16 (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) vs 48 (Xeon Bronze 3106) — the Xeon Bronze 3106 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 870,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) and C621 (Xeon Bronze 3106).
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon Bronze 3106 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 | 2133+71000% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+4368967% | 768 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features
Only the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Bronze 3106 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Bronze 3106). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon Bronze 3106 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Legacy | — |
Value Analysis
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE launched at $265 MSRP, while the Xeon Bronze 3106 debuted at $395. On MSRP ($265 vs $395), the Phenom II X6 1100T BE is $130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom II X6 1100T BE delivers 21.7 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Bronze 3106 — making the Phenom II X6 1100T BE the 39.3% better value option.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon Bronze 3106 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $265-33% | $395 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.7+49% | 14.6 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













