
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Popular choices:

Xeon E3-1220 v5
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E3-1220 v5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 28.1 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $203 MSRP).
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.
Xeon E3-1220 v5
2015Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $62 less on MSRP ($203 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.1 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($203 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,713 vs 5,745).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Xeon E3-1220 v5
2015Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E3-1220 v5.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $62 less on MSRP ($203 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.1 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($203 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 28.1 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $203 MSRP).
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,713 vs 5,745).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X6 1100T BE better than Xeon E3-1220 v5?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 136 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Xeon E3-1220 v5

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1220 v5
Xeon E3-1220 v5
The Xeon E3-1220 v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,713 points. Launch price was $203.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E3-1220 v5 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220 v5 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220 v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1100T BE scores 5,745 against the Xeon E3-1220 v5's 5,713 — a 0.6% lead for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1220 v5.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+10% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Skylake-DT (2015) |
| PassMark | 5,745 | 5,713 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 508 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1220 v5 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) / not specified (Xeon E3-1220 v5). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Legacy | — |
Value Analysis
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE launched at $265 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1220 v5 debuted at $203. On MSRP ($265 vs $203), the Xeon E3-1220 v5 is $62 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom II X6 1100T BE delivers 21.7 pts/$ vs 28.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1220 v5 — making the Xeon E3-1220 v5 the 25.9% better value option.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $265 | $203-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.7 | 28.1+29% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













