
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +119.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $66 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 309.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +119.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $66 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 309.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Phenom II X6 1100T BE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Ryzen 5 3600

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Ryzen 5 3600's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1100T BE scores 5,745 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 101.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 508 vs 1,295, a 87.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+433% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 5,745 | 17,685+208% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 508 | 1,295+155% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 870,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Legacy | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE launched at $265 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($265 vs $199), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $66 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom II X6 1100T BE delivers 21.7 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 121.6% better value option.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1100T BE | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $265 | $199-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.7 | 88.9+310% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












