
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 115W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅141.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 215.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌360% higher power demand at 115W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570 A
2022GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 115W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅141.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 215.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌360% higher power demand at 115W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce MX570 A?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce MX570 A still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 55 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 186 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 220 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 214.9%. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570 A) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) with 64 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 19,548+215% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+219% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2460 MHz+113% |
| ROPs | 40 | 48+20% |
| TMUs | 64 | 96+50% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 24+50% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 96+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX570 A lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX570 A is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX570 A comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 183.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 272 GB/s+183% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 128.6% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-78% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+46% | 170.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 0.3% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 215.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7 | 65.4+216% |
| Codename | GA107 | AD107 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #387 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













