
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:

T400 4GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 30W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌57.2% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 30W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 30W, a 5W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌57.2% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 30W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is T400 4GB better than GeForce MX450?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce MX450 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 2 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and T400 4GB

GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
T400 4GB
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 3,803+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+133% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+195% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz+11% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX450 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T400 4GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-17% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+17% | 126.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP, while the T400 4GB launched at $159. The T400 4GB costs 36.4% less ($91 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 23.9 (T400 4GB) — the T400 4GB offers 60.4% better value. The T400 4GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $159-36% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 23.9+60% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | TU117 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #523 | #518 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













