
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M485X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M485X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M485X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 250W, a 225W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon R9 M485X
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌80% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌900% higher power demand at 250W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020Radeon R9 M485X
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M485X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M485X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 250W, a 225W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌80% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌900% higher power demand at 250W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M485X better than GeForce MX450?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce MX450 make more sense than Radeon R9 M485X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 10 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and Radeon R9 M485X

GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

Radeon R9 M485X
Radeon R9 M485X
The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the Radeon R9 M485X reaches 3,801 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M485X uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 3,801+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+9% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX450 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M485X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 M485X's 250W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M485X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-90% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+879% | 15.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450. The GeForce MX450 costs 44.4% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 8.4 (Radeon R9 M485X) — the GeForce MX450 offers 77.4% better value. The GeForce MX450 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-44% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9+77% | 8.4 |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Amethyst |
| Release | August 1 2020 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #523 | #519 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












