
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:

Radeon 840M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 30W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon 840M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 30W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020Radeon 840M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 30W, a 5W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 30W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 840M better than GeForce MX450?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce MX450 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and Radeon 840M

GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

Radeon 840M
Radeon 840M
The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the Radeon 840M reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the Radeon 840M uses RDNA 3+, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 256 (Radeon 840M). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 3,803+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3+ |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+250% | 256 |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 2900 MHz+84% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX450 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 840M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the Radeon 840M's 30W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (Radeon 840M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-17% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+17% | 126.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 840M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | — |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Krackan Point |
| Release | August 1 2020 | June 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #523 | #516 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












