
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7970M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 7970M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 7970M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 100W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon HD 7970M
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 100W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020Radeon HD 7970M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 7970M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 7970M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 100W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 100W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce MX450 better than Radeon HD 7970M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7970M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and Radeon HD 7970M

GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

Radeon HD 7970M
Radeon HD 7970M
The Radeon HD 7970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,663 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the Radeon HD 7970M reaches 3,663 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 7970M uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 7970M). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970M).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720+2% | 3,663 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1280+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+48% | 2.176 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX450 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7970M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7970M has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 7970M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the Radeon HD 7970M's 100W — a 120% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7970M). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-75% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+307% | 36.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | — |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Wimbledon |
| Release | August 1 2020 | April 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #523 | #531 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












