GeForce MX450 vs Radeon HD 7970M

NVIDIA

GeForce MX450

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7970M

2012Core: 850 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce MX450

2020

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 7970M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 7970M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
  • Draws 25W instead of 100W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon HD 7970M

2012

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • 300% higher power demand at 100W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce MX450 better than Radeon HD 7970M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,720 vs 3,663 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce MX450 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (25W vs 100W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce MX450 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2012, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce MX450 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $250 MSRP. GeForce MX450 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce MX450 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $250 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.6% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $250 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (25W vs 100W), and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is Radeon HD 7970M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon HD 7970M is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce MX450 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce MX450Radeon HD 7970M
1080p
low90 FPS81 FPS
medium80 FPS69 FPS
high63 FPS56 FPS
ultra53 FPS36 FPS
1440p
low80 FPS71 FPS
medium68 FPS61 FPS
high52 FPS44 FPS
ultra44 FPS28 FPS
4K
low39 FPS25 FPS
medium37 FPS24 FPS
high25 FPS16 FPS
ultra22 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce MX450Radeon HD 7970M
1080p
low125 FPS150 FPS
medium92 FPS112 FPS
high65 FPS81 FPS
ultra42 FPS54 FPS
1440p
low82 FPS102 FPS
medium56 FPS71 FPS
high41 FPS54 FPS
ultra29 FPS39 FPS
4K
low36 FPS51 FPS
medium27 FPS37 FPS
high21 FPS29 FPS
ultra15 FPS20 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce MX450Radeon HD 7970M
1080p
low167 FPS165 FPS
medium134 FPS132 FPS
high112 FPS110 FPS
ultra84 FPS82 FPS
1440p
low126 FPS124 FPS
medium100 FPS99 FPS
high84 FPS82 FPS
ultra63 FPS62 FPS
4K
low84 FPS82 FPS
medium67 FPS66 FPS
high56 FPS55 FPS
ultra42 FPS41 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce MX450Radeon HD 7970M
1080p
low167 FPS144 FPS
medium134 FPS114 FPS
high112 FPS97 FPS
ultra84 FPS80 FPS
1440p
low126 FPS104 FPS
medium100 FPS85 FPS
high84 FPS73 FPS
ultra63 FPS56 FPS
4K
low84 FPS61 FPS
medium67 FPS46 FPS
high56 FPS36 FPS
ultra42 FPS25 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and Radeon HD 7970M

NVIDIA

GeForce MX450

The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7970M

The Radeon HD 7970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,663 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the Radeon HD 7970M reaches 3,663 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 7970M uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 7970M). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970M).

FeatureGeForce MX450Radeon HD 7970M
G3D Mark Score
3,720+2%
3,663
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896
1280+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+48%
2.176 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
80+25%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX450 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7970M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce MX450Radeon HD 7970M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7970M has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 7970M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce MX450Radeon HD 7970M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the Radeon HD 7970M's 100W — a 120% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7970M). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce MX450Radeon HD 7970M
TDP
25W-75%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
148.8+307%
36.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX450 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce MX450Radeon HD 7970M
MSRP
$250
Codename
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Wimbledon
Release
August 1 2020
April 24 2012
Ranking
#523
#531