
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:

P104-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than P104-100: it remains the more sensible modern option while P104-100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 30W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
P104-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 30W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020P104-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than P104-100: it remains the more sensible modern option while P104-100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 30W, a 5W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 30W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce MX450 better than P104-100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is P104-100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and P104-100

GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

P104-100
P104-100
The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the P104-100 reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the P104-100 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 1,920 (P104-100). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720+1% | 3,678 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1920+114% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 6.655 TFLOPS+106% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 1733 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 120+88% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX450 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The P104-100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the P104-100's 30W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (P104-100). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-17% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+21% | 122.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP, while the P104-100 launched at $0. The P104-100 costs 100+% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs Infinity (P104-100) — the P104-100 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce MX450 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GP104 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | December 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #523 | #529 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












