
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+623.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 202% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 200W, a 175W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+623.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 202% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌700% higher power demand at 200W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce MX450?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce MX450 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 272 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 623.6%. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 26,919+624% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 5888+557% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+804% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 2475 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 184+188% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX450 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX450 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce MX450) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 530% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 504 GB/s+530% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 155.6% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-88% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | — | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+11% | 134.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce MX450 costs 58.3% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 201.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-58% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 44.9+201% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | AD104 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #523 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












