
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+508.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 281.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+508.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 281.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce MX450?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce MX450 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 255 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 255 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 508.9%. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 22,651+509% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 4352+386% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+584% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 2535 MHz+61% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 136+113% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX450 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX450 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce MX450) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 260% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 288 GB/s+260% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-84% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+5% | 141.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce MX450 costs 37.3% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 281.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-37% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 56.8+281% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | AD106 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #523 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












