
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 115W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+425.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 339.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌360% higher power demand at 115W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 115W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+425.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 339.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,720 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌360% higher power demand at 115W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce MX450?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce MX450 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 55 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 186 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 220 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 425.5%. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 19,548+425% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 3072+243% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+368% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 2460 MHz+56% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 96+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX450 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX450 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce MX450) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 240% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 272 GB/s+240% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 128.6% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-78% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8 | 170.0+14% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. The GeForce MX450 costs 16.4% less ($49 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 338.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-16% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 65.4+339% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | AD107 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #523 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












